<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relativity of time &#8211; shortcomings in Python datetime, and workaround</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mfabrik.com/2008/06/30/relativity-of-time-shortcomings-in-python-datetime-and-workaround/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mfabrik.com/2008/06/30/relativity-of-time-shortcomings-in-python-datetime-and-workaround/</link>
	<description>Freedom delivered.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:27:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: naxa</title>
		<link>http://blog.mfabrik.com/2008/06/30/relativity-of-time-shortcomings-in-python-datetime-and-workaround/comment-page-1/#comment-3266</link>
		<dc:creator>naxa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redinnovation.com/?p=47#comment-3266</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s the same issue as
http://bugs.python.org/issue1553577
it&#039;s closed becouse based on a comment, it is not a bug actually. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s the same issue as<br />
<a href="http://bugs.python.org/issue1553577" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.python.org/issue1553577</a><br />
it&#8217;s closed becouse based on a comment, it is not a bug actually. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.mfabrik.com/2008/06/30/relativity-of-time-shortcomings-in-python-datetime-and-workaround/comment-page-1/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 08:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redinnovation.com/?p=47#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>Also not sure if the Java guys got it right, although they didn&#039;t get it as hilariously wrong as Python. What we really need is a Python equivalent for Java&#039;s jodatime libraries - which are about as good as it gets in terms of date handling libraries.

I think what bothers me is that most responses to questions about timezone handling in Python seem to brush away the issue - the worst case being that the documentation states that UTC is equivalent to GMT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also not sure if the Java guys got it right, although they didn&#8217;t get it as hilariously wrong as Python. What we really need is a Python equivalent for Java&#8217;s jodatime libraries &#8211; which are about as good as it gets in terms of date handling libraries.</p>
<p>I think what bothers me is that most responses to questions about timezone handling in Python seem to brush away the issue &#8211; the worst case being that the documentation states that UTC is equivalent to GMT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chobas.com&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Labor Day</title>
		<link>http://blog.mfabrik.com/2008/06/30/relativity-of-time-shortcomings-in-python-datetime-and-workaround/comment-page-1/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>chobas.com&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Labor Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redinnovation.com/?p=47#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>[...] Doubly fail if you silently throw away timezone information, or well you can just read this and this. At least I&#8217;m not the only [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doubly fail if you silently throw away timezone information, or well you can just read this and this. At least I&#8217;m not the only [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://blog.mfabrik.com/2008/06/30/relativity-of-time-shortcomings-in-python-datetime-and-workaround/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redinnovation.com/?p=47#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Bravo. Great blog on an annoying topic. Thanks for the fix too.

Not so sure that the Java guys got it right first time. Count the number of deprecated methods in class Date.  Also, I like it when object names (Class names) represent &quot;real&quot; things. What on earth is an instance of GregorianCalendar. I thought that would be a singleton: there is only one GregorianCalendar. In this context the Joda package is worth a look.

Thanks again for the very helpful blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo. Great blog on an annoying topic. Thanks for the fix too.</p>
<p>Not so sure that the Java guys got it right first time. Count the number of deprecated methods in class Date.  Also, I like it when object names (Class names) represent &#8220;real&#8221; things. What on earth is an instance of GregorianCalendar. I thought that would be a singleton: there is only one GregorianCalendar. In this context the Joda package is worth a look.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the very helpful blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenboo</title>
		<link>http://blog.mfabrik.com/2008/06/30/relativity-of-time-shortcomings-in-python-datetime-and-workaround/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>kenboo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redinnovation.com/?p=47#comment-504</guid>
		<description>thanks for the article, and the fixed_datetime.  I too was so tired of Python&#039;s datetime class lacking proper time zone support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the article, and the fixed_datetime.  I too was so tired of Python&#8217;s datetime class lacking proper time zone support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wcyee</title>
		<link>http://blog.mfabrik.com/2008/06/30/relativity-of-time-shortcomings-in-python-datetime-and-workaround/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>wcyee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redinnovation.com/?p=47#comment-402</guid>
		<description>&quot;If only someone could persuade Python devs to add something similar to the standard library…&quot;

Have you brought this up on the python or python dev list? It certainly sounds like something they would (or should) consider ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If only someone could persuade Python devs to add something similar to the standard library…&#8221;</p>
<p>Have you brought this up on the python or python dev list? It certainly sounds like something they would (or should) consider &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
